Blog

Author Archives: JAVIER MARTINEZ DIAZ

The dissolution of a company due to the paralysis of its corporate bodies constitutes a disposable matter capable of being submitted to arbitration

What is the paralysis of corporate bodies? Pursuant to Article 363.1(d) of the Spanish Companies Act (Ley de Sociedades de Capital), “the paralysis of the corporate bodies in such a manner as to render their functioning impossible” constitutes a statutory ground for dissolution. In such cases, the company is under a legal obligation to dissolve.However, […]

A sparse yet sufficient motivation does not warrant the annulment of an equity-based arbitral award for breach of public policy

What Constitutes the Motivation of an Arbitral Award? An arbitral award must meet certain internal requirements, one of which is the duty of motivation. This entails the arbitrators’ obligation to present the reasons and grounds underpinning their decision, thereby enabling the parties to understand the essential criteria guiding the resolution of the dispute. However, the […]

Impartiality of the Arbitrator in Arbitration: Analysis of a Recent Case

The impartiality of an arbitrator is a fundamental requirement in any arbitration proceeding. However, in certain situations, parties may allege a lack of impartiality to attempt to annul an arbitral award. Below, we analyse a recent case addressing this issue. What is Arbitrator Impartiality? When an arbitrator is appointed, they must ensure their neutrality and […]

The Acceptance of a Jurisdictional Challenge Due to Arbitration Agreement Does Not Entail the Judicial Appointment of an Arbitrator

What is a Jurisdictional Challenge Due to Arbitration Agreement? When the parties to a contract agree to submit any disputes arising from it to arbitration, such disputes must be resolved through that means. If one party, instead of resorting to arbitration, initiates judicial proceedings against the other on the basis of the contract, the defendant […]

The Non-Disclosure of Links Between Arbitrators and a Law Firm May Justify Their Challenge

What is the Challenge of an Arbitrator? If during the course of arbitral proceedings, doubts arise regarding the impartiality or independence of an arbitrator, the parties have the right to challenge them in order to remove them from the tribunal. The challenge must be grounded in the applicable national law and the arbitration rules governing […]

Doubts Regarding Jurisdiction to Arbitrate a Dispute Subject to a Limitation Period May Lead to the Relaxation of Such Period

What Does It Mean for an Action to Be Subject to a Limitation Period? In legal proceedings, two main types of time limits are distinguished: prescription and limitation. Limitation periods, unlike prescription, do not allow for the suspension or restarting of the timeframe. Once the stipulated period elapses, the right to bring the action expires […]

Filing an Annulment Claim of an Arbitral Award with an Incompetent Court May Lead to Action Expiry

What happens when an annulment claim of an arbitral award is filed with the wrong court? Assuming, in any case, that an annulment claim of an arbitral award is filed within the civil jurisdiction, we may encounter two types of filing errors that could significantly impact the statutory two-month limitation period for filing an annulment […]

The High Court of Justice of Madrid upholds the judicial appointment of an arbitrator even though the appointed Arbitration Court was dissolved.

What happens when an Arbitration Court is dissolved? The case in question arose out of a contractual lease relationship, in which the arbitration clause indicated that any dispute was to be resolved before the Court of Economic Arbitration in Law and Equity, No. GUARANTEE NUM000, in accordance with the arbitration agreement. However, this court had […]

TSJM annuls award for breach of public order

TSJM anula laudo por vulneración del orden público

The Chamber has concluded that there has been a violation of public policy in its procedural aspect, as the additional evidence was not extemporaneous and should have been admitted in order to preserve the equality of arms between the parties. Arbitration Proceedings and Additional Evidence In the arbitration proceedings, the respondent-respondent proposed additional evidence after […]

Madrid Court Voids Arbitral Awards for Insufficient Reasoning

El Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid estima dos acciones de nulidad de laudos por infracción del orden público debido a su falta de motivación.

Despite the recent constitutional caselaw, the Madrid High Court of Justice has recently ruled in favour of two applications to have arbitral awards set aside on the grounds that their lack of reasoning undermines public policy. The first case, Judgment 30/2023 of 12 September, finds in favour of the application to set aside, holding that […]

Skip to content